Across professional landscapes, there are events of professional negligence that go unnoticed , and then there are stories that call an organization’s ethical standards into question. The narrative of David Collins, a manager at Ventia once recognized as Broadspectrum, exemplifies this type of scenario — a chronicle of dubious professional actions that casts a shadow over professional credibility but throws doubt over the enterprise’s ethical framework .


Even in light of the disturbing claims , Collins has held onto his title , apparently unimpacted by the turmoil surrounding him. Why has this misconduct gone unchecked? What does this say about the company’s commitment to responsibility? According to the accounts of those familiar , Collins’ pattern of ethical violations started with breaches of internal policies , but it didn’t stop at that . Instead, it evolved into repeated infractions that has left colleagues disillusioned and stakeholders unsettled .


Amid a executive coaching event — ostensibly meant to strengthen leadership abilities — David Collins allegedly turned an opportunity for growth into a platform for misconduct . It’s reported he spent business-funded trips attempting to seduce female colleagues , browse website , a clear breach of Ventia’s organizational standards , all while his home life was kept in the dark.


But the ethical breaches extended beyond those incidents . One of the most troubling a post discoveries David Collins involves his alleged abuse of digital tools for personal gratification—a gross violation of IT protocols . His reckless exploitation of company communication channels to engage in suggestive conversations —including emojis flaunting extramarital affairs — reveals an attitude of impunity. Following these online indiscretions , Collins allegedly increased his behavior further : he is said to have engaged in intimate encounters with an employee on multiple occasions during business days , despite his being married and her a post having a committed relationship . This obvious misappropriation of company time and resources violated every workplace standard but also tore apart homes— leaving a path of mistrust that extended far beyond the office .

Why is this conduct still being tolerated? How does such behavior continue without repercussions? The explanation, it appears, highlights a systemic failure in oversight. Despite reports, no action has been taken against him.

This lack of oversight conveys a risky precedent : that power within the organization shields wrongdoers . Kerikeri David Collins It breeds a damaging work setting , discourages ethical behavior , and ultimately harms the company’s standing .